Magna Death Watch

Well, we all pretty much knew it was coming, but today's announcement that Magna Entertainment (the race track company) and MI Developments (the real estate company) are abandoning their much-ballyhooed reorganization plan makes it more likely than not that we'll see Frank Stronach in bankruptcy court next month.

Under the plan that had been announced last fall, MI Developments would have injected substantially more cash into Magna Entertainment, and ultimately Stronach would have taken over complete control of the racing empire. The collapse of the plan, in the wake of strong criticism -- and threats of lawsuits -- from MI Developments' minority shareholders, puts Magna Entertainment in an impossible cash position.

Without the reorganization plan, Magna Entertainment will now face accelerated repayment of a variety of loans, both to MI Developments and to outside parties such as the Bank of Montreal. The details are available in the Magna statement and in Ryan Conley's report today in the Blood-Horse online, but in broad terms, Magna Entertainment has to come up with some $275 million, at least, in March unless it can renegotiate its loans.  Further details of Magna's obligations are reported by the Baltimore Sun. Something's got to give, since MEC doesn't have the cash.

Halsey Minor: if you're out there, there might be some race tracks for sale, cheap.
Update (11:39 pm): Magna also announced on Thursday that the Toronto Stock Exchange has begun an expedited review of whether Magna Entertainment stock should continue to be listed on the exchange. Despite a 1-for-20 reverse stock split last year, MEC shares are once again trading under $1, or at the equivalent of 3 cents a share if the price is adjusted for effects of the stock split. At that price, MEC may not even be trading on the penny-stock "Pink Sheets" much longer.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Economics of Owning a Race Horse in New York

I've been wanting for some time to write about the economics of racing from the owners' and trainers' point of view. And the quarterly ritual of preparing financial statements for my Castle Village Farm partnerships has finally provided both the motivation and the data to get started. So, this post will look at racing from an owner's point of view. I'll follow up later with a look at the economics of being a trainer. In both cases, I'll be focusing on the New York racing scene, that is, as an owner or a trainer stabled at Aqueduct or Belmont, and making an annual pilgrimage to Saratoga. New York has the best purses around -- they'll average over $700,000 a day at the upcoming Saratoga meet -- but it also has very high expenses. So, even with the kind of horses that most of us are satisfied to have -- solid, hard-working thoroughbreds -- not a stakes horse, but not a $4,000 Finger Lakes claimer either -- it's not easy to come out ahead -- even when you...
Read more

NEWSPAPER RESTRUCTURING IS PAINFUL, BUT NECESSARY

Financial pages are full of developments and changes at newspaper companies and these are being commented upon anxiously by those in the industry. Unpleasant conditions certainly abound, but these development are not indications that the industry is dead or dying in the near future. What they signal is that things which worked in the past are not working now, that newspaper companies are badly in need of restructuring, refocusing, and renewal, and that the boards of the companies and the company managers are taking badly needed action. The techniques for restructuring are no mystery. First, you need some cash. This can be obtained by attracting new capital through investment or loans. New York Times Co. did this recently by borrowings $250 million from Carlos Slim. Other firms are looking for friendly investors with liquidity. Another way of raising cash is by turning assets into cash. A classic move made by many types of firms is the sell their building and lease back any space that i...
Read more

Is the future of digital journalism an outside job?

Making small digital news providers sustainable has become the holy grail of journalists and the search continues for workable business models and revenue streams. Advertising may produce some revenue, but it will never generate sufficient resources to support digital journalism because so little advertising money is available for sites with small audiences. About three-quarters of all online advertising goes to the top 10 sites and Google, Facebook, Microsoft, and Yahoo account for about 60 percent of all online revenue. This leaves very little advertising expenditures to be contested among all other players--of which news providers are only a small fraction. At the same time, the prices paid for online advertising are falling because there are so many sites offering advertising, the advertising inventory is nearly infinite, and audiences continue fragmenting. This means the majority of funding for start-up digital journalism must come from elsewhere and online news sites—especially s...
Read more