Vegas Race Books and TrackNet Reach Agreement

The Las Vegas Review-Journal reports that TrackNet, the Churchill-Magna alliance, has reached an agreement with the Nevade Pari-Mutuel Association that will permit the Vegas race books to resume taking parimutuel pool bets on the Churchill and Magna tracks as early as today. The race books had been blacked out for 16 days, as TrackNet sought higher fees for its simulcast signals.

No details on how much the fees have been increased are available, but they've certainly been raised from the historically low levels that the tracks let Vegas get away with for years.  My guess, though, is that the new agreement will still pay CHurchill and Magna less -- a lot less -- than the 6-7% for purses and another 6-7% for the sending track that has been the goal of the Thoroughbred Horsemen's group.  Fes for the simulcast signal from major tracks in recent years have tended to be between 3% and 5%, which is then divided between the track and the purse account.

An interesting freature of the TrackNet-Vegas agreement is that it sets up a two-tier system, under which the race books will pay a higher rate for premium tracks -- Santa Anita, Churchill and Gulfstream -- and a lower rate for the rest of the tracks in the TrackNet group, including the Fair Grounds, Arlington, Golden Gate, Laurel, Pimlico, Lone Star and Oaklawn.  That makes some sort of economic sense (at least to someone like me, whose horses run mostly on the "premium" NYRA circuit), but I can see horsemen's groups at the second-tier tracks being less than overjoyed.  It remains to be seen if any of those groups will exercise their veto, granted by the federal Interstae Horse Racing Act, to block their signal.

While it's undoubtedly a good thing to have racing available on as many platforms as possible, including the Vegas race books, one wonders whether TrackNet pushed the negotiations as far as they might have.  TrackNet itself is a large online betting operator, and it certainly has a built-in conflict of interest between its desire to increase online (and race book) betting on the one hand and Churchil and Magna's presumed interests as race track operators on the other.

Just as the current economic situation makes it hard for organized labor to take militant action, so the economic crisis in racing makes it difficult for horsemen's groups to be too militant about raising their share of online betting revenue. For now, we're all just trying to survive.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Economics of Owning a Race Horse in New York

I've been wanting for some time to write about the economics of racing from the owners' and trainers' point of view. And the quarterly ritual of preparing financial statements for my Castle Village Farm partnerships has finally provided both the motivation and the data to get started. So, this post will look at racing from an owner's point of view. I'll follow up later with a look at the economics of being a trainer. In both cases, I'll be focusing on the New York racing scene, that is, as an owner or a trainer stabled at Aqueduct or Belmont, and making an annual pilgrimage to Saratoga. New York has the best purses around -- they'll average over $700,000 a day at the upcoming Saratoga meet -- but it also has very high expenses. So, even with the kind of horses that most of us are satisfied to have -- solid, hard-working thoroughbreds -- not a stakes horse, but not a $4,000 Finger Lakes claimer either -- it's not easy to come out ahead -- even when you...
Read more

NEWSPAPER RESTRUCTURING IS PAINFUL, BUT NECESSARY

Financial pages are full of developments and changes at newspaper companies and these are being commented upon anxiously by those in the industry. Unpleasant conditions certainly abound, but these development are not indications that the industry is dead or dying in the near future. What they signal is that things which worked in the past are not working now, that newspaper companies are badly in need of restructuring, refocusing, and renewal, and that the boards of the companies and the company managers are taking badly needed action. The techniques for restructuring are no mystery. First, you need some cash. This can be obtained by attracting new capital through investment or loans. New York Times Co. did this recently by borrowings $250 million from Carlos Slim. Other firms are looking for friendly investors with liquidity. Another way of raising cash is by turning assets into cash. A classic move made by many types of firms is the sell their building and lease back any space that i...
Read more

Is the future of digital journalism an outside job?

Making small digital news providers sustainable has become the holy grail of journalists and the search continues for workable business models and revenue streams. Advertising may produce some revenue, but it will never generate sufficient resources to support digital journalism because so little advertising money is available for sites with small audiences. About three-quarters of all online advertising goes to the top 10 sites and Google, Facebook, Microsoft, and Yahoo account for about 60 percent of all online revenue. This leaves very little advertising expenditures to be contested among all other players--of which news providers are only a small fraction. At the same time, the prices paid for online advertising are falling because there are so many sites offering advertising, the advertising inventory is nearly infinite, and audiences continue fragmenting. This means the majority of funding for start-up digital journalism must come from elsewhere and online news sites—especially s...
Read more